8月16日托福综合写作终极预测及范文解析

1.（命中指数：5星）阅读：某个地方的洞穴Erdstall可能有三种用途

(1)储存牲口或粮食

(2)当shelter，躲避强盗attack

(3)宗教用途。灵魂等候区（为死去的人提供场所，让他们等待超生）

听力里驳斥：

(1)洞会漏雨水，储存食物不方便。在冬天Erdstall都被淹没了，而且也没发现里面有谷类残留

(2)Erdstall太小了，只能勉强装下一家人。而且存氧气很少，只够一个人的量。另外，只有一个入口，不太可能

像为了逃跑设计的。

(3)宗教用途. 如果是的话，应该所有有共同宗教信仰的村子都有，但是有的村子有，有的村子没有。

The reading passage proposes three hypotheses regarding the functions of the Erdstall, a narrow, underground structure built in [ name of place mentioned in the reading ]. However, the lecture points to the weakness of the three hypotheses.

First, the Erdstall could have been used to keep livestock or to store food. However, the lecturer argues that the Erdstall is not rainwater-proof. Particularly in the winter, the Erdstall could have been flooded. So it is not an ideal place to store food. Furthermore, no traces of grain have been found in the Erdstall. Therefore, the storage hypothesis is unlikely.

Second, the Erdstall could be a shelter against attack or burglary. This is also not possible in the lecturer’s opinion, because, as he argues, the Erdstall is so small that it could barely accommodate one family, and the oxygen inside the Erdstall is sufficient to sustain only one person. Another obvious weakness of this hypothesis is that the Erdstall has only one entry point and does not have an exit, making it unlikely to serve as an escape route.

Finally, it is theorized that the Erdstall could have religious functions, serving as a chamber of soul for the deceased. Yet if this were true, according to the lecture, the Erdstall should have been found in every village across the whole region which shares the same religion. The fact, however, is that the Erdstall is only present in some, not all, of the villages. So the religion hypothesis is unconvincing, either.

  索取热线：400-618-0272

2. （命中指数：5星）

阅读： lionfish 从Indo 洋扩展到太平洋了，阅读中有三种方法来解决：

（1）人工捕捉它们来protect coral reef 生物系统

（2）把他们引入fish market，这样可以减少对 local fish 的需要，让他们能有时间 recover

（3）人们可以把它们用于日常饮食，因为它们高蛋白，低脂肪

听力：教授全部反对

（1）人工捕捉无法区分lionfish 和其他鱼，很多 rare 的鱼也都在coral reef ，会牵连其他鱼种

（2）引进市场会导致有人人工养殖。 Lionfish 如果从 fish farm escape ，这就造成了更严重的 invasive 问题

（3）有些lionfish 是有毒的，吃了以后会造成 vomiting numbness arching，我们无法检验每一条鱼，所以吃他们unsafe。

真题还原：

Reading:

[1]. Lionfish are known for eating anything they can fit in their mouths, and seem to eat nearly constantly. During a study of invasive lionfish in the Bahamas, one lionfish was observed to eat twenty small fish in the space of thirty minutes and reduce the juvenile fish populations greatly. Fast-growing and capable of reproducing year-round, lionfish are also out-competing native species and spreading more quickly than anyone predicted.

With their indiscriminant eating habits, lionfish eat out other species in a rapid speed, which prevent algal overgrowth on reefs and therefore a healthier reef environment. The Caribbean lionfish invasion could become the most disastrous marine invasion in history by drastically decreasing the abundance of coral reef fishes throughout the entire region. Thus, they should be caught for the reason of protecting the coral reef.

[2]. On the same line, since lionfish directly impact populations of numerous fish and crustacean species, including commercially valuable species like snappers, groupers, lobsters and so on. By catching lionfish, the reduced number of them will allow other fishes, especially the fish for the local market purpose to recover and bounce back in numbers.

[3]. Lionfish make for delicious, delicate, economical fillets that offer a perfect pop of protein and low fat meat. There are no catch limits, and they can be prepared dozens of ways. Once stripped of its venomous spines, cleaned and filleted like any other fish , the lionfish becomes delectable seafood fare. This is a great source of nutrients for the local people.

Listening:

[1]. When human capturing the lionfish, they ‘also catch other fishes at the same time. Where lionfish appears, there are many other fishes around. Besides, there are many rare fish, such as species like parrotfish, which can prevent algal overgrowth on reefs and or lobsters that catch starfish for the wholesomeness of the reef environment. Thus, this methods will not allow people to distinguish which fish is which fish and will eventually hurt everything in that area.

[2]. In the second place, if lionfish is introduced to the fish market, the "benefits" of selling such fish will turn into the private fishing farm problem. In other words, fish-selling people will artificially propagate or artificially cultivate lionfish. As we all know that farmed fish may escape the pen's netting and this will cause more serious invasive problem to the local ecosystem.

[3]. Thirdly, after tests of nearly 200 lionfish show that more than a quarter exceed federal levels for a toxin that cannot only cause - diarrhea, vomiting and fatigue - but also neurological problems such as painfully tingling hands and feet, a feeling of having loose teeth, and, oddest of all, a reversed sense of temperature. Besides, we cannot examine all the fish one by one, so this is not a sound and safe idea.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉 

3.(命中指数：5星)在 Rhone river 发现了一个bust

阅读：passage 里面认为是罗马的一个leader－西泽大帝，原因有三。

（1）雕塑风格（realism）是西泽时期引入的；

（2）雕塑特点和罗马铸币上西泽相似（the style of hair）；

（3）发现雕塑的地点在一条河，以前人们想销毁它，因为有新的leader 上任，留着它是不respect。

听力：lecture 完全反驳这个观点，原因有三。

（1）写实主义是在西泽之后才引入的，所以不可能是西泽；

（2）雕塑的特点也不完全一致，西泽有Slim nose and long leg，和雕塑不符合；

（3）最后一原因罗马人把没有用的雕塑都往河里扔，举了一个叫Neptune 的雕塑，是古罗马的一个神。

The lecture and the reading passage both talk about a life-size marble bust, found during an archaeological excavation and retrieved from the bed of the river Rhone. While the author of the passage attributes this bust to Julius Caesar, the lecturer refutes each of the arguments presented in the reading.

First, the style of the portrait could not be used as evidence to show that this bust was that of Julius Caesar. Although the bust was made in a style very popular during Caesar’s time, this style continued to be popular many years after Caesar died. Therefore, this bust could very well have been made in a much later time for someone other than Caesar.

Second, the similarities between the bust and the portrait of Caesar on silver coins were rather limited to the hair only. In other features such as the neck and the nose, there are many obvious differences. If the bust was Caesar’s, then it should have looked the same in all features to other portraits of Caesar.

Finally, the location where the bust was found could not prove anything. Archaeological study also excavated other items from the same place including a sculpture for the God of Neptune. This indicates that people could have thrown things into the river because they have become useless rather than because of political reasons, as what the reading suggests.

4.（命中指数：5星）

阅读: To Build Crossings for wildlife 的缺点

(1)动物不会用这些为他们建的 crossings; they are not trained to make use of it

(2)弄这些crossings 很浪费钱啊: Financial waste

(3)而且the areas affected by road or by other human development that have already been damaged too much. Not a

long term strategy. 因栖息地都坏掉，不要(无法)建crossings,这样可以保护动物待在同一个区，虽然这样也许会让 population 下降。

听力:反对阅读

(1)说虽然动物现在不会用这些 crossings，但是他们是可以学习的嘛，比如十年后，他们就会用了。

(2)教授说不浪费钱啊，动物和人之间的 collisions 不仅对动物，对人类也造成了很大伤害，很多人都受伤了还是怎么的，说考虑到这些因素，建 crossings 能保护人类啊。

(3)教授说动物们待在一个保护区里不能去别的地方，数量当然下降了， crossings 可以连结 fragmental 的栖息地，然后动物就可以自由自在的穿梭，繁衍生息

Casting doubts on the issue whether or not wildlife crossings should be made for the greatest benefits of human beings and wildlife creatures, the speaker holds a perspective contrary to the reading passage.

The first point is about whether the animals can use the crossings and it means that if animals do not know how to make use of the crossings, it is not advantageous to the building plan; however, from the listening passage, it says that animals can be trained to use the man-made crossings. For example, the bear and wolves cases in the listening that they can make use of the crossings after certain time, such as a decade co-existing with the crossings. The reading passage nevertheless holds that those wildlife animals cannot use the crossings and the building plan will be invalid.

Secondly, according to the speaker, it is not a financial waste for building wildlife crossings. If there are no crossings built, the damage can be made not just to animals, but to vehicles and to humans. Building wildlife crossings is conducive to mutual benefits; thus it is not wasting money. This likewise refutes the author from the passage in that building wildlife crossings is a total waste of money; it will not help humans to save money on the accidents.

Thirdly, the speaker thinks that building wildlife crossings can actually help animal solve the fragmentation problem by creating links and bridges that overcome the main barriers such roads and other human development so that animal can have full access to all their territories. This can provide them more opportunities to survive, thrive and grow as they have more chances to find food and reproduce. Yet, the reading indicates it is better to keep wildlife animals in reserved areas where they can better be protected. In short, the points put forth about the wildlife crossings in the reading and listening are contradictory.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉 

5.（命中指数：5星）Transient lunar phenomena (TLP)

阅读文章：

TLP（月球瞬变现象），就是观察月光以判断EVENTS但这个现象不靠谱。

(1)这个光有可能因为器械的随机错误造成例如望远镜。

(2)the moon get a lot of METEORS STRIKING as the earth.

(3)the stone on the moon absorbs energy from the sun reflection

听力讲座：

Lecture反驳：

(1)we can observe the TLP in 2 special places；

(2)这种现象虽然发生但只有1秒，而TLP can keep about 20 minutes every time。

(3)虽然石头有可能反光，但那个月球本身的光照要亮好多吧，那个ROCK的光是很WEAK的。

Transient lunar phenomenon, or TLP, is the change in color and light on the surface of the Moon, a phenomenon that is often reported in astronomical observations of the moon, particularly of the Aristarchus plateau region on the Moon. The reading passage suggests three plausible hypotheses to explain the occurrence of TLP, each of which is refuted in the lecture.

First, the reading suggests that TLP might have been caused by random flaws in observational equipment such as the telescope. However, the professor argues that if TLP were indeed caused by flaws in measurement, then such phenomenon would have been observed everywhere on the Earth. But the fact is that TLP can only been observed from two special locations on the Earth.

The second hypothesis is meteor impact, which occurs on the Moon’s surface as frequently as it does on the Earth. This theory is also refuted by the professor, who argues that the impact of a meteor strike only lasts about 1 second, but TLP can be observed for as long as 20 minutes. Clearly, meteor strike could not have been the cause.

Finally, according to the reading, the stones on the moon may have absorbed and reflected light from the Sun. It is such reflection that may have caused TLP. Yet the lecturer is skeptical about this hypothesis. He(she) says that even though rocks can reflect light from the Sun, such reflection is much weaker compared with the light observed in a TLP event.

6. （命中指数：5星）hydroelectric dam的好处

Reading: hydroelectric power plants three advantages

(1). low cost

(2). low pollution

(3). the water paths protect wildlife

Lecture: disagree

(1). account of the research cost for selecting location and building cost, the cost of hydroelectric plants is not low

(2). hydroelectric plants produce the same amount of greenhouse gases as fossil fuel plant do

(3). water paths cannot protect all fishes, an example in England, a kind of fish cannot use the water path as salmon do.

Be suspicious of whether hydroelectric power is advantageous to us compared with other power, the speaker holds a perspective contrary to the reading passage.

The first point is about the cost and it means that prior to a dam can be built, many studies have to be researched and made sure if the rock around the potential dam can support the heavy and massive construction. The dams cannot be built just anywhere near a river source. In addition, the cost of building a dam is enormous. This is not cost cutting. However, the reading thinks dams are built right in the source and do not need extra fuel to transport the power, so it is more inexpensive.

Secondly, according to the speaker, even though the operation of such plant does not generate greenhouse gases, hydroelectric plants crate flooded areas that make large amounts of plant material to decompose and decay. This is "the source" of producing greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. For tropical areas where vegetation is densest, the damage to the environment is just the same compared to coal plants. This likewise refutes the author from the passage in that hydroelectric plants do not cause harmful gases to the surroundings.

The third point is regarding the wildlife. It is true that salmon can be saved in the research because they are strong and get upstream from the dam. This is not the case for other kinds of fish in England. The fish cannot move vertically up to bypass the dam. To be more concise, hydroelectric plants still cause negative ejects wildlife. Thus, all points from the reading passage are different from those stated in the listening content.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉 

7.（命中指数：5星）美国的 Death Valley 里300kg 的大石头会动（moving stones），有人试着解释。

阅读：

（1）第一种理论是风吹动的，因为存在关于山谷里有大风的纪录，且天下雨的时候，muddy 很变得很平，适合让风吹动石头。

（2）第二个理论是地下水晚上结冰，石头就能动了。

（3）第三个理论是人类恶搞的，比如麦田圈就是。

听力：

（1）没有风强到能吹到石头，并且给了张照片，石头陷在muddy 里，按writer 的理论，石头不应该陷下去的。

（2）这里沙漠，水根本不够，并且沙漠里温度太高，就算晚上能结冰，白天就化了，没法搬动石头。

（3）如果是人干的，那一定会留下痕迹，这种muddy 里，没有人能做到不留痕迹。而现场既没有人的痕迹，也没有马的痕迹。

The reading passage tries to explain why some stones in desert areas show signs of moving slowly across the surface. However, all the three theories proposed in the reading are refuted by the lecturer.

The first theory is that the stones are moved by the forces of winds. This is made possible by powerful windstorms in the valley and muddy and slippery surfaces on rainy days. However, the professor argues that winds strong enough to move a rock have never been recorded on Earth. Furthermore, there’s evidence showing that part of the stones is beneath the muddy surface, indicating that the stones are not sliding on the surface.

The second theory is that the rocks move because of the floating ice sheets that surround the rocks. However, this theory is also not possible because, as the speaker says, the desert area is extremely dry, so it lacks the amount of water to form large ice sheets. Even though ice could possibly form during the night when the temperature drops, during the day the ice would melt. Therefore, ice sheets could not have been the forces at play.

Finally, there is the possibility that human or animal intervention rather than natural forces made this happen. However, if this were true, the professor says, then there would have been traces left of humans or animals moving the rocks, and these traces would not have been easily removed in such muddy places. Yet the fact is that neither the traces of humans nor those of horses exist near the moving rocks. So the human intervention theory is highly unlikely.

8.（命中指数：5星）讲 congestion pricing。说为了缓解交通拥堵，想要在city 中的某个区域收费，这样就能缓解一下。

阅读文章支持，三个理由：

（1）这样做可以improve time (主要就是说节省时间)

（2）可以改善环境improve that area's environment

（3）收的fee 可以用于revenue the city 可以再修路，修桥等等 lecture 中，professor 否定了这个观点。

（1）他认为这样做有些司机不愿意花钱走这个区域就得绕路，更浪费时间。举了个例子：送快递的，他们要省钱，所以送快递的时候会变长。

（2）在收费区里面环境可能会好点，但是周围的车相对就会增多，noise and air pollution 就会多。所以不是整个city都能环境变好

（3）有的人不能afford 这个费用了，就会去坐subway，政府就得出更多的钱维护subway，这样一来收的那点钱可能还不够维护的，所以也不能起到帮助修桥，修路什么的作用了。

The policy of congestion pricing is enforced in some urban areas in order to alleviate traffic congestion. The reading passage explains the benefits of congestion pricing, while the lecture warns that this policy has a number of negative effects.

The reading suggests that congestion pricing reduces traffic so drivers can reach their destination in less time. However, the lecturer contends that not all people will find it time-saving. Some drivers will go round the pricing zone in order to avoid congestion surcharges. For example, delivery drivers will take a longer route to avoid this additional cost, so the delivery time is increased.

The second benefit mentioned in the reading is that congestion pricing improves urban environment. However, the lecturer points out that this may be true for areas within the charging zone because there is less traffic there. But in the surrounding areas, pollution and noise may become worse as a result of increased level of traffic that moves to those areas.

Finally, according to the reading, congestion charges are a source of cityrevenue which can be used by the governmentto improve public facilities such as roads and bridges. Yet the lecturer argues that this policy will lead some people toswitch from driving to using public transportation such as the subway. This will entail an additional cost for subwaymaintenance, which may even exceed the revenue from congestion pricing. Therefore the policy will not help improveroads and bridges.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉 

9. （命中指数：4星）洞穴壁画。

（1）洞穴画里有大量动物主题，而且有一些是当时的首要狩猎对象，还有一些箭的图案，受伤的动物，所以表现的都是狩猎场景。

（2）有出现人身兽头的图像，说是因为他们常常用动物头伪装成动物打猎，所以画这些画。

（3）史前人类作画很多时候是因为认为画有魔力，可以通过作画影响一定的现实，所以画出来的狩猎场景就是为了保证打猎顺利而作

听力：反驳阅读，给出理由是：

（1）洞穴里有大量的动物主题，但也有犀牛和猫，这两样不怎么被狩猎，而且很多画的动物也没有wounded啊；还有根本就没那个时候最常被狩猎的动物—驯鹿，所以说动物主题和打猎不一定有关系。

（2）壁画上的人身兽头是因为当时的人们相信他们的祖先的灵魂会附在动物身上。为了和祖先交流，他们会举办一些仪式活动，这些兽头很可能是为了这种仪式才画上去的。而且说是猎人，那么打猎的活动猎人形象应该是站着的，可是画上的人是水平姿势的，所以这个解释站不住脚

（3）这个magical power在不同的文化中有不同的含义啊，in some case，这是一种仪式，actually the magical power their ancestors believe in is that they can communicate with the animals living around.

The reading passage explains the purpose of prehistoric paintings found in Lascaux Cave in France. According to the reading, these paintings were created by the painters with the hope of finding good luck to ensure successful hunting. However, the lecturer disagrees with this explanation.

First, the reading states that there are large animals in some paintings depicted as being wounded by spears and arrows, suggesting that these animals were hunted by the painters.（关联视频里对动物图案有一定介绍） However, the lecturer points out that there are other paintings that depict small animals such as cats and reindeers, which prehistoric people did not hunt. Moreover, some animals in the paintings do not appear to have been wounded. So these paintings may not be related with hunting.

Second, human figures with animal heads may not be proof that the paintings were related with hunting. According to the lecturer, some human figures do not appear in the painting to be standing; some are even sleeping. They were clearly not hunting in such a horizontal position, so it is probably not true that the humans in the paintings are wearing animal heads as a camouflage while hunting.

The third theory in the reading proposes that the painters created these paintings because they believed that these paintings might have magical powers. But the lecturer argues that this magical power might have nothing to do with hunting. The painters might have believed that they could communicate with their ancestors’ spirits through these painted animals.

10.(命中指数：4星)

阅读：北美有段时间大型动物灭绝，是因为人类活动的关系。原因有三：

(1) 人类出现和大动物同时发生；

(2) 大动物向来没天敌，所以对人类没有戒心，人就得手了；

(3) 人类喜欢杀大动物，所以小动物就没死吧。

听力：

(1) 同时出现不代表有因果关系，有很多地方没有人但是动物还不是灭绝了，所以说是一个全球性的影响，比如气候；

(2) 没证据表明人能搞死大动物，况且古代人不在一个地方常驻，不可能把一个动物搞绝迹。那个时候的人类没有保存肉的方法，所以不太可能去hunt大动物；

(3) 同时期小动物也死了不少。

Being skeptical about the theory of the relation between human hunting and the extinction of large mammals in North America, the listening passage puts forth a perspective totally contrary to the reasons stated in the reading content.

To begin with, it is about the timing human beings came to the place where large mammals were wiped out. The listening passage says that there is no exactly the cause and effect relation for the extinction of those large mammals with the arrival of human beings. That is to say, the extinction and the time of human arrival are just a coincidence and such large extinction must be caused by something else, such as weather abnormality. However, the reading indicates, it is human beings appearing to certain areas that large animals were extinct and they were happened at the same period of time.

Secondly, the contradictory point regards-the behavior of large animals. To be more concise, large mammals did not have predators at that time, so human hunting was not a difficult job. From the listening however, it says that human beings did not know food preservation skills to keep meat for a long time and they hunted only what they needed. So, the declining number of large animals should not be so drastic due to this reason. Additionally, human beings were moving a lot and it is not convincing at all whatsoever that all the large mammals were extinct.

Lastly, the lecturer suggests that not just large mammals were extinct at that time, but were many smaller ones, such as certain kinds of birds. The reading content however shows that human beings only hunted for large mammals. What shall be the explanation why smaller animals were also extinct at that time? Thus, the listening supports other theories for such extinction, such as extreme weather condition and the forth. To conclude, the listening content is totally opposing to what the reading says in the article.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉 

11.（命中指数：4星）

阅读：小额贷款（microcredit）给 poor 没用

1.因为the poor 没有business 的经验，即使借钱给他们，也不会成功；

2.增加银行 administrative cost；

3.这样的话政府 投资给poor 的会减少。

听力：反驳。

1.可以 educate them, 并举了例子 India, teach them how to finance, how to budget

2.可以给 a small of group, instead of each person，这样的话cost 也不会增加

3.穷人从international 机构中获得贷款之后，government save money 可以用于 bridges and road。

In the lecture, the speaker makes several points about the advantages of microcredit, a way used to help the poor for a successful future; this method however is supported by the reading passage.

The first point is about if microcredit really helps the poor in business. From the reading, it says that borrowers can only benefit from such loans when they have the knowledge of finance and business setting up experience. However, this is different from the listening in that many financial agencies provide basic financial education to customers when they ask for taking out such loans, such as how to budge wisely, how to keep costs down and the forth.

Moreover, from the reading passage, microloans are not effective because they are costly to process, adding up burden to the bank. However, the professor asserts that microcredit benefits the poor. For instance, banks do not need to respond to the entire individual request. In other words, four or five customers can take out a loan together and share the administrative costs.

Finally, the professor points out that microcredit could ensure the government to be investing the money saved into other fields. For example, governments can use this money to build infrastructure such as roads, bridges, or power lines. Those things are all helping the citizens. However, the reading says that government can pass the responsibility of helping the poor onto the side of bank.

In conclusion, micro financing is not a great idea to help the poor to get rid of their poverty and difficulty in life. Thus, the reading passage and the listening content are contradictory on stands held toward this issue.

12.（命中指数：4星）说有个manhaten还是甚么的鱼快灭绝了，政府让减少捕捞，但文章不同意。

阅读：

(1)不是捕捞引起的，是另一种BASS还是甚么的动物吃光了这种manhaten鱼，应该转而去减少这种BASS鱼。

(2)说这种鱼是当地农业的重要原料，不让捕捞影响农业。

(3)会减少当地人的工作机会。

听力反驳：

(1)这种BASS对于控制当地很多生物的数量、保证生态平衡有巨大作用，灭了这种鱼生态系统会被破坏。

(2)说这种鱼并不是唯一原料，另一种东西已经作为原料用得很好了。

(3)减少只是暂时的，如果继续捕捞让这种鱼灭绝了，当地的捕捞业就彻底玩完了，更没工作。

The population of the menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay has been declining due to overfishing, so the government has called for a ban on menhaden fishing in the area. The author of the passage is concerned that such a ban may not be the right solution, while the lecturer gives the opposite opinion, arguing that the ban is necessary and justified.

First, the reading points to the fact that the real cause of the decline in the menhaden population is not fishing, but the striped bass, a major predator of the menhaden, so rather than limiting menhaden fishing, we should reduce the population of the striped bass. However, the lecture argues that the striped bass serve as an important link in the eco-system, keeping the population of many fish species under control. We should avoid disturbing the natural balance of the ecosystem, so the best solution is still a ban on menhaden fishing.

Second, the reading suggests that the menhaden are an important source of protein for livestock and poultry. Placing a ban on menhaden fishing would negatively affect nearby farms. The lecturer, however, states that the menhaden can be replaced by soybean, which is also a very effective source of protein for livestock and poultry. Therefore, banning fishing in the Chesapeake Bay would not create any shortage of proteins necessary for farms in the nearby areas.

Finally, the author of the passage is worried that limiting menhaden fishing would lead to the loss of job opportunities for fishermen, dealers and in the processing industries, which would hamper the local economy. From the lecture, however, we learn that the ban on menhaden fishing is only a temporary policy. Once the population of the menhaden returns to normal, the ban will be lifted and fishing and other related industries will grow healthily again. On the other hand, if overfishing is not stopped, it would result in a total collapse of the local economy sooner or later.

关键词：预测 汇总 托福综合写作 范文 8月16日 机经

更多阅读>>>

推荐阅读〉〉〉