双语阅读：举办世界杯能赚钱吗？

世界杯是体育迷们的盛事，但是从经济角度来说，举办世界杯的国家往往不能赚钱反而亏欠。有体育经济学家曾经说过：“世界杯是一个臭名昭著、糟糕的经济发展落脚点，对于发展中国家来说尤其如此。”下面跟着小编一起去看看详情吧！

　　　拨打免费电话400-618-0272，咨询托福疑难。

In a mid-May meeting with sports journalists, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff used a local metaphor to say that once the World Cup began, Brazilians would forget their worries. “Once the jaguar drinks the water,” she said, “this country will go crazy.”

在5月中旬与体育记者的会面当中，巴西总统迪尔玛 罗塞夫(Dilma Rousseff)引用了一个当地的比喻，她说：“一旦美洲豹开始喝水，这个国家就会为之疯狂。”意思是说世界杯一开始，巴西人就会将烦恼抛之脑后。

That Dilma (as she is known) hopes that the local populace will get swept up in the spectacle is understandable, considering the protests she s endured over her government s spending on the event.

迪尔玛(人们经常以她的名来称呼她)寄希望于用这场盛大的赛事来俘获巴西人民的心，这一点是可以理解的，因为反对本届政府在世界杯方面花费过高的抗议活动让她头疼不已。

At the opening ceremony for the Confederations Cup soccer tournament in Brasilia last June, Dilma and Sepp Blatter, the president of FIFA, which runs the World Cup, were booed by protesters demanding better education, healthcare, and transportation.

在去年6月举行的联合会杯足球锦标赛开幕仪式上，迪尔玛和国际足联(世界杯运营方)主席瑟普 布拉特(Sepp Blatter)遭到了反对人士的狂嘘，因为这些人要求政府把钱花在改善教育、医疗和交通服务方面。

This May, demonstrators angry that the country was spending money on new stadiums — whose estimated costs have risen by half since 2010, to $3.5 billion — instead of low-income housing held another wave of protests in 18 Brazilian cities. Some held banners saying, “FIFA go home.”

 今年5月，抗议者的愤慨引发了巴西另一波大规模游行，涉及18个城市，有些人还打着“国际足联滚回去”的标语。其原因在于国家将钱花在了新体育馆的修建上，而没有用于解决低收入人群的住房问题。新场馆的预计成本自2010年来上升了一半，达到了35亿美元。

Polls taken by the Folha de S o Paulo show thatsupport for the World Cup has fallen from 79% in 2008 to 48% today.

《圣保罗页报》(Folha de S o Paulo)举行的民意调查显示，对于世界杯的支持人数已从2008年的79%跌至如今的4%。

Even Brazilian soccer star Pele has begun to complain.

连巴西足球明星贝利(Pele)也开始对此感到忿忿不平。

It s clear that, politically speaking, the money spent to build the stadiums was a lot,” he said recently in Mexico City. “Some of this money could have been invested in schools, in hospitals.”

他最近在墨西哥城说：“很明显，从政治上来说，大把的钱都用在了体育馆的修建上。其中有些钱本应投到学校和医院当中。

　　　拨打免费电话400-618-0272，咨询托福疑难。

If history is any guide, Dilma will get her wish and public discontent will turn into happiness once the first game starts. But that euphoria will pass. And it won t answer whether spending billions to host a World Cup makes economic sense, especially for a developing country in dire need of basic improvements.

从历史经验来看，一旦第一场赛事开始之后，迪尔玛的愿望便会实现，而且民众的不满情绪也会被愉悦所取代。但是这种幸福感迟早是会烟消云散的。然而对于一个急需改善基本面的发展中国家来说，一时的精神愉悦并不能解答花费数十亿美元举办世界杯是否具有经济意义这个问题。

“World Cups are notoriously bad economic development anchors, particularly in developing countries, and four of the last five hosting countries have lost money,” says John Vrooman, a Vanderbilt University sports economist.

范德堡大学(Vanderbilt University)体育经济学家约翰 弗罗曼(John Vrooman)说：“世界杯是一个臭名昭著、糟糕的经济发展落脚点，对于发展中国家来说尤其如此。在以往的5个举办国中，4个都亏了钱”。

South Africa s experience since hosting the 2010 World Cup illustrates Vrooman s point.

南非在举办2010年世界杯后的经历便证明了约翰 弗罗曼的观点。

Like Brazil, South Africa built and upgraded several stadiums (10 in its case, compared to Brazil s 12). And, as in Brazil, several were located in cities with no major professional teams to take them on after the Cup.

与巴西一样，南非新建和翻修了数家场馆(南非总共10个，巴西12个)。而且，在巴西，多个体育场都分布在没有重要职业球队的城市，因此，世界杯过后这些场馆也就没有职业球队去使用。

“The great South African stadiums built for the World Cup are largely white elephants now, appropriate given the setting,” says Neal Collins, a sports journalist in South Africa.

南非体育记者尼尔 柯林斯( Neal Collins)表示，“南非为世界杯所修建的大型场馆如今基本上已变成了名副其实的白象(昂贵的摆设)。”

Patrick Bond, a professor at the University of KwaZulu-Natal s School of Built Environment and Development Studies in South Africa, estimates that the country spent about $2.5 billion on stadiums that, because they are underused, require some $18-24 million in annual maintenance and operation subsidies.

夸祖鲁纳塔尔大学(University of KwaZulu-Natal)南非建成环境与开发研究学院教授帕特里克 邦德(Patrick Bond)预计，南非在场馆建设方面花费了25亿美元，因为这些场馆使用率不高，而且每年的维修和运营补贴需要约1800-2400万美元。 

　　　拨打免费电话400-618-0272，咨询托福疑难。